ELECTION RIGGED????


User avatar

Posts: 11

Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:16 pm

Post Sat Aug 06, 2016 4:21 pm

ELECTION RIGGED????

SEARCH YAHOO FOR DIEBOLD VOTING MACHINES, SELECT WIKIPEDIA AND DISCOVER STATEMENTS LIKE THE FOLLOWING:

The company RABA did a security analysis of the Diebold AccuVote in January 2004 confirming many of the problems found by Avi Rubin and finding some new vulnerabilities.[14]

In June 2005, the Tallahassee Democrat reported that when given access to Diebold optical scan vote-counting computers, Black Box Voting, a nonprofit election watchdog group founded by Bev Harris, hired Finnish computer expert Harri Hursti and conducted a project in which vote totals were altered, by replacing the memory card that stores voting results with one that had been tampered with. Although the machines are supposed to record changes to data stored in the system, they showed no record of tampering after the memory cards were swapped. In response, a spokesperson for the Department of State said that, "Information on a blog site is not viable or credible."[15]

In early 2006, a study for the state of California corroborated and expanded on the problem;[16] on page 2 the California report states that:

"Memory card attacks are a real threat: We determined that anyone who has access to a memory card of the AV-OS, and can tamper it (i.e. modify its contents), and can have the modified cards used in a voting machine during election, can indeed modify the election results from that machine in a number of ways. The fact that the results are incorrect cannot be detected except by a recount of the original paper ballots" and "Harri Hursti's attack does work: Mr. Hursti's attack on the AV-OS is definitely real. He was indeed able to change the election results by doing nothing more than modifying the contents of a memory card. He needed no passwords, no cryptographic keys, and no access to any other part of the voting system, including the GEMS election management server."

A new vulnerability, this time with the TSx DRE machines, was reported in May 2006. According to Professor Rubin, the machines are "much, much easier to attack than anything we've previously said... On a scale of one to 10, if the problems we found before were a six, this is a 10. It's a totally different ballgame." According to Rubin, the system is intentionally designed so that anyone with access can update the machine software, without a pass code or other security protocol. Diebold officials said that although any problem can be avoided by keeping a close watch on the machines, they are developing a fix.[17]

THEY FIXED THE PROBLEM BY NO LONGER HAVING PAPER BALLOTS SO "NO" TRACE-ABILITY!!!!! IF EACH VOTING PLACE ELECTRONICALLY SENDS THE RESULTS TO A CITY/COUNTY COMPUTER SOFTWARE COLLECTION POINT THEN THEY SEND THE RESULTS TO A STATE COLLECTION POINT WHICH THEN SENDS THEM TO DIEBOLD/CONTRACTOR FOR SUMMARIZING WITHOUT A PAPER TRAIL ANYWHERE....ARE BOTH SIDES OF THE ISLE IN TROUBLE????? EVEN WORSE, WHAT IF VOTING MACHINES SEND SUMMARIZED DATA DIRECTLY TO DIEBOLD/CONTRACTOR WITHOUT ANY PAPER BALLOTS, NO OVERSIGHT/AUDIT BY LOCAL OFFICIALS???? MAYBE SOMETHING AS SERIOUS AS VOTER FRAUD SHOULD CARRY A VERY VERY VERY LONG JAIL SENTENCE AND CONFISCAPE ALL ASSETS??? :evil:
User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 3703

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:26 pm

Post Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:42 pm

Murder, Spies & Voting Lies on Youtube


Return to Presidential Election

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software.